OreLens
Mineral Prospectivity Intelligence
Sign in to your account
New here? Create an account
Need an enterprise/SSO account instead? Contact support@orelenstechnology.com
© 2026 OreLens Technology · Secure platform  ·  Terms  ·  Privacy
No project selected
Live |
API |

Prospectivity Rankings

Draw an AOI, select a project, and run analysis to see prospectivity rankings.

Prospective km²
Run analysis to populate
Top Zone Score
Confidence %
Dry-hole cost
Run analysis to populate
NPV P50 (base)
Run analysis to populate
🗺 Prospectivity Heatmap
Low
Moderate
High
Anomalous
Target zone
🎯 Top Drill Targets · Ranked by Confidence
💰 Cost per km² vs. Dry Hole
Survey / km²
$4,200
Drill permit
Drill mob.
Dry hole total
Run an analysis with an AOI drawn to estimate survey ROI.
Using generic default assumptions — click "Edit costs" to enter your vendor quote
📈 NPV Range · Current Model
P10
P50
P90
Run an analysis, then adjust assumptions in NPV Simulation.
💧 Hydric Mapping · Social License
High-sensitivity zones
Buffer compliance
Sensitivity index
Target

Run a prospectivity analysis in Map & Analysis to see economic viability scoring here.

Target

Run a prospectivity analysis in Map & Analysis to see the geological interpretation here.

Run a prospectivity analysis in Map & Analysis to see capital allocation here.

Run a prospectivity analysis in Map & Analysis to review targets here.

🎯 All Drill Targets · Confidence Ranking
📐 Depth Model · Ranked Targets
📊 Confidence Intervals · All Targets
TargetRangeP50
Data Completeness
0/15
categories covered
✓ Uploaded — file received
★ Recommended — improves score accuracy
○ Optional — extra enhancement
↗ External — sourced outside app
AI Model Training
Checking…
Loads 68 real mineral deposits (Li, Au, Cu, REE) to calibrate the prospectivity engine. Runs automatically on first launch — no command needed.
Switch to this tab to load checklist…
⚠ Illustrative, not a bankable NPV. This simulator scales a simple heuristic anchor (derived from the top-ranked target's confidence score, or a fixed $38M preview value before you've run an analysis) by your slider inputs. It does not use real resource tonnage, a mine plan, or a commodity price deck — none of which OreLens collects. Treat the P10/P50/P90 figures and value-driver sensitivities as order-of-magnitude illustrations only.
⚙️ Simulation Parameters
Li price ($/t)$22,000
Discount rate8.0%
Recovery rate84%
Mine life14 yr
CapEx variance+0%
P10 · Bear
$12M
P50 · Base
$38M
P90 · Bull
$71M
📊 NPV Distribution
$12M$38M$71M
Key value drivers — computed from the sim formula below, not independent data
Adjust a slider to compute…
💧 Hydric Sensitivity Map
River / stream
Water body / wetland
2km sensitive buffer
Protected area (no-drill)
Draw an AOI on the Map tab to load real hydrology data.
👥 Social License Risk Assessment
High-risk zones — draw an AOI
Draw an AOI and open this tab to load real rivers, wetlands, and protected areas from OpenStreetMap.
Recommended mitigation (general guidance)
· Establish 2km buffers around flagged wetlands/water bodies per local regulations
· Consult permitting authority before any activity near protected areas
· Commission a site-specific hydrological survey before drilling
Modelled sensitivity index
Draw an AOI to compute.
🤖 OreLens Assistant
Answers using this session's live data
Ask about what's on screen — e.g. "give me specific details on the Hydric Mapping" or "why is DT-01 ranked first?". Answers are grounded in your current AOI, drill targets, and cost/NPV assumptions, not generic knowledge.